[cfe-dev] c++-analyzer on llvm-clang svn r160917

[Jordan Rose]

To anyone outside the analyzer group who's watching this: the giant jump in bugs reported comes from turning on inlining of C++ methods. The problem is that called methods are using more defensive programming than the callers actually need, and so our heuristics about whether to warn about something (say, a possible null pointer dereference) get very confused.

We definitely need to rework our heuristics here!
Jordan


On Jul 28, 2012, at 11:10 PM, John Smith <lbalbalba at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> The results from running scan-build (r160917) on llvm-clang svn r160917 :
> 
> http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/clang-analyzer/llvm-clang/r160917/
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> John Smith.
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev