[cfe-dev] clang::CXXRecordDecl::data __assert_fail. Clang problem, or bug in my VisitCXXRecordDecl() implementation?
Peeter Joot
peeter.joot at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 13:42:04 PST 2012
I've got an AST visitor defined with the following method:
class MyASTVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<MyASTVisitor>
{
...
bool VisitCXXRecordDecl( CXXRecordDecl* r )
{
cout << "VisitCXXRecordDecl:: CLASS: " << r->getName().str() << endl ;
for ( CXXRecordDecl::base_class_iterator b = r->bases_begin(), e =
r->bases_end() ;
b != e ; ++b )
{
CXXBaseSpecifier & a = *b ;
const QualType & q = a.getType() ;
cout << r->getName().str() << " : " << q.getAsString() << endl ;
}
return true ;
}
This is triggering the following assertion:
classvisitor:
/home/peeterj/clang/optimized/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h:522: struct
DefinitionData &clang::CXXRecordDecl::data(): Assertion `DefinitionData &&
"queried property of class with no definition"' failed.
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00007ffff6f20645 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) where
#0 0x00007ffff6f20645 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007ffff6f21c33 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007ffff6f19329 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3 0x0000000000467b85 in clang::CXXRecordDecl::data (this=0x155f740) at
/home/peeterj/clang/optimized/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h:522
#4 0x0000000000467ade in clang::CXXRecordDecl::bases_begin
(this=0x155f740) at
/home/peeterj/clang/optimized/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h:640
#5 0x00000000004681af in MyASTVisitor::VisitCXXRecordDecl
(this=0x7fffffff8f70, r=0x155f740) at classvisitor.cpp:61
#6 0x0000000000467ffa in
clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<MyASTVisitor>::WalkUpFromCXXRecordDecl
(this=0x7fffffff8f70, D=0x155f740)
at /home/peeterj/clang/optimized/include/clang/AST/DeclNodes.inc:207
#7 0x000000000041f13f in
clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<MyASTVisitor>::TraverseCXXRecordDecl
(this=0x7fffffff8f70, D=0x155f740)
at
/home/peeterj/clang/optimized/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h:1586
#8 0x000000000041d0f9 in
clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<MyASTVisitor>::TraverseDecl
(this=0x7fffffff8f70, D=0x155f740)
at /home/peeterj/clang/optimized/include/clang/AST/DeclNodes.inc:207
#9 0x000000000041c7f4 in MyASTConsumer::HandleTopLevelDecl
(this=0x7fffffff8f60, DR=...) at classvisitor.cpp:122
#10 0x0000000000612c75 in clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) ()
#11 0x0000000000612f70 in clang::ParseAST(clang::Preprocessor&,
clang::ASTConsumer*, clang::ASTContext&, bool, clang::TranslationUnitKind,
clang::CodeCompleteConsumer*, bool) ()
#12 0x0000000000419b31 in main (argc=77, argv=0x7fffffffd008) at
classvisitor.cpp:314
(gdb) frame 5
#5 0x00000000004681af in MyASTVisitor::VisitCXXRecordDecl
(this=0x7fffffff8f70, r=0x155f740) at classvisitor.cpp:61
61 for ( CXXRecordDecl::base_class_iterator b =
r->bases_begin(), e = r->bases_end() ;
(gdb) p *r
$1 = {<clang::RecordDecl> = {<clang::TagDecl> = {<clang::TypeDecl> =
{<clang::NamedDecl> = {<clang::Decl> = {_vptr$Decl = 0x132a350,
NextInContextAndBits = {Value = 0}, DeclCtx = {Val = {Value =
20481056}}, Loc = {ID = 1203259}, DeclKind = 25, InvalidDecl = 0,
HasAttrs = 0, Implicit = 0, Used = 0, Referenced = 0, Access =
3, FromASTFile = 0, Hidden = 0, IdentifierNamespace = 6,
HasCachedLinkage = 0, CachedLinkage = 0}, Name = {Ptr =
22363280}}, TypeForDecl = 0x155f7d0, LocStart = {
ID = 1203253}}, <clang::DeclContext> = {DeclKind = 25,
ExternalLexicalStorage = 0, ExternalVisibleStorage = 0, LookupPtr = {Value
= 0},
FirstDecl = 0x0, LastDecl = 0x0},
<clang::Redeclarable<clang::TagDecl>> = {RedeclLink = {NextAndIsPrevious =
{Value = 22411074}}},
TagDeclKind = 3, IsCompleteDefinition = false, IsBeingDefined =
false, IsEmbeddedInDeclarator = false, IsFreeStanding = true,
NumPositiveBits = 0, NumNegativeBits = 0, IsScoped = false,
IsScopedUsingClassTag = false, IsFixed = false, RBraceLoc = {ID = 0},
TypedefNameDeclOrQualifier = {Val = {Value = 0}}},
HasFlexibleArrayMember = false, AnonymousStructOrUnion = false,
HasObjectMember = false,
LoadedFieldsFromExternalStorage = false}, DefinitionData = 0x0,
TemplateOrInstantiation = {Val = {Value = 0}}}
Is it appropriate for me to be attempting to iterate over the base classes
in this CXXRecordDecl() override, or is this a bug in the AST visitor
library?
$ ~/clang/optimized/bin/clang --version
clang version 3.3 (trunk 169628)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
--
Peeter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20121210/5358b556/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list