[cfe-dev] Rewriting function calls

Yin Qiu qiuyin at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 08:42:33 PST 2012


在 2012-12-7,15:15,Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> 写道:

> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:34 AM, qiuyin at gmail.com <qiuyin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> I am thinking about reverse the order of arguments in a call expression with clang. I'm leveraging the refactoring tool and the AST matcher framework. I use a matcher to find those calls i'm interested in, rewrite the expr, and  insert one replacement. Things go tricky for nested calls. Because the refactoring tool applies replacements one by one, and order adjustment does not change the total text length, one replacement could overwrite prior changes. Do i have to implement my own replacement applying algo (i'm thinking about adding source range references to a replacement object, and applying them recursively), or is there a simple and better way to do this?
> 
> The problem is that I think the problem is not solvable in general - there is a class of replacements that's recursively applicable though. I think it makes sense to add support for those in the refactoring library. I have no clue yet how to do that though :)
> 
> The easy workaround is to do one non-overlapping refactoring at a time (that has worked every time so far for us)[
> 

Can you please share a little bit more details about your workaround? For this particular nested call case, did you mean running the refactoring tool for several passes? If so, I may not be able to adopt this approach because in my case a partially replaced function call cannot compile, which means the AST may not be well built.

Thanks!

> Cheers,
> /Manuel
>  
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
> 





More information about the cfe-dev mailing list