[cfe-dev] [PATCH] Improve __interface support

[John McCall]

On Aug 18, 2012, at 8:21 AM, João Matos wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:57 PM, David Robins <llvm at davidrobins.net> wrote:
> See previous message to list ("CXCursor value for __interface"):
> 
> This seems like a real problem. The C API clients should have access to this information. Not having enough space seems like a real problem, especially since more declarations will probably need to be exposed in the future to libclang. John, what is the policy on binary compatibility?

For the C API, it's important.  I don't know the role of the "max" constants, but I suspect that clients are meant to be conservative about cursor kinds that they don't understand.

But I am not an expert in this API.

John.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20120819/5dadcc09/attachment.html>