[cfe-dev] libclang based doxygen-like tool

[Slav]

Hope, I am mistaken, but Clang does not keep comments, isn't it so? But it
is impossible to imagine a documentation generation tool which skips
comments...

2012/8/18 Slav <slavmfm at gmail.com>

> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Slav <slavmfm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hope, I am mistaken, but Clang does not keep comments, isn't it so? But
>> it
>> > is impossible to imagine a documentation generation tool which skips
>> > comments...
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012/8/17 Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Andy Gibbs <andyg1001 at hotmail.co.uk>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:01 PM, Don Hinton wrote:
>> >> >> I've sent copies you and the others who expressed an interest,
>> >> >> and will look into hosting it somewhere.
>> >> >
>> >> > Isn't this exactly the sort of thing that should end up in the
>> >> > clang-tools-extras repository?
>> >> >
>> >> > What do others think?  Chandler, this is your thing isn't it?
>> >>
>> >> Definitely, once the design has been discussed; my main concern would
>> >> be that the tool nicely fits the latest extensions to clang's comment
>> >> parsing, and has a clear strategy and maintenance story going forward.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> /Manuel
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers
>> >> > Andy
>> >> >
>> >> > P.S. Don, I'd also be interested in a copy too :o)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > cfe-dev mailing list
>> >> > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> >> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cfe-dev mailing list
>> >> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20120818/74a8a6ab/attachment.html>