[cfe-dev] Passing StructType arguments directly

[David Meyer]

Sandeep,

Theoretically, in the future, the official IRT would be built by
PNaCl, so that any native code would need to match our ABI.
Furthermore, if we can demonstrate that we can match the performance
and reliability of the nacl-gcc toolchain, we could legitimately
require every vendor to switch to PNaCl.

- pdox

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:25 AM, David Meyer <pdox at google.com> wrote:
>> The good news is, going forward, we'll have greater control over the
>> ABI. Now that we know about these problems, we can impose ABI
>> requirements on future NaCl specifications to make sure they are
>> compatible with the bitcode we generate. Which means the only problem
>> at this point is X86-32 and X86-64 which already have existing ABIs we
>> need to satisfy.
>
> And you're never going to want PNaCl to interoperate with validated native code?
>
> deep
>