[cfe-dev] Odd piece of Clang 2.1 behaviour

[Dallman, John]

> OK. No, there is no gcc-4.2 binary in Xcode 4.2.

Thanks for the confirmation. That's going to make life simpler if I
can stay on Xcode 4.1.

thanks,

--
John Dallman


-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Daniel Dupas [mailto:devlists at shadowlab.org]
Sent: 12 October 2011 12:11
To: Dallman, John
Cc: clang-dev Developers
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Odd piece of Clang 2.1 behaviour


Le 12 oct. 2011 à 13:08, Dallman, John a écrit :

> Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
>
>> The problem is that I don't think Apple support new features in GCC.
>
> This is entirely survivable. The software has to be portable across a
> lot of platforms.
>
>> Shouldn't be required, as this [-stdlib=libstdc++] is the default.
>
> Making it explicit simply ensures it gets into documentation, and that
> we don't get surprised when the default changes.
>
>> /Developer/usr/bin/gcc --version
>> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc.
>> build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.1.00)
>
> llvm-gcc is the default gcc at Xcode 4.1, but that also has a non-LLVM
> gcc at /Developer/usr/bin/gcc-4.2. The information I have is that isn't
> present at Xcode 4.2.
>

OK. No, there is no gcc-4.2 binary in Xcode 4.2.

-- Jean-Daniel