[cfe-dev] Following up on C++11 final and undefined-reference linker errors
Chandler Carruth
chandlerc at google.com
Wed Nov 30 01:43:54 PST 2011
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Sebastian Redl <
sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote:
> On 30.11.2011 05:04, John McCall wrote:
> > I am still totally comfortable with unconditionally rejecting the
> definition of a final abstract class, however.
> I agree that this is the best behavior.
Thirded. Error.
> It makes absolutely zero sense
having such a beast. We should also file a DR for that.
As Richard and I discussed this, we came to the same conclusion. He may
have already started the process of filing a DR?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20111130/4242d70a/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list