[cfe-dev] [PATCH] MS compatibility flag implies delayed parsing

[Aaron Ballman]

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't see why the changes to lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp and
> include/clang/Driver/CC1Options.td are necessary.  The changes to
> lib/Driver/Tools.cpp look fine.

I'm not certain I understand why the two are separate from one
another.  Can you give me a quite education on the topic?

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Francois Pichet <pichet2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> How about we remove --fdelayed-template-parsing altogether and check
> for fms-compatibility to do late template parsing?
>
> Anybody else needs delayed template parsing without microsoft compatibility?

That would be the best solution IMO, but I wasn't sure if anyone was
relying on them being separated.  If no one objects, I can remove the
delayed template parsing param and simply roll the functionality into
MS compatibility.  But I do have one question on this -- should I
simply remove the flag entirely (so people start getting warnings
about unused flags), or should I leave the flag in and make it no-op?

Thanks!

~Aaron