[cfe-dev] linking coverage library
Nick Lewycky
nlewycky at google.com
Mon May 23 20:21:20 PDT 2011
On 17 May 2011 00:45, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote:
>
> > Recently I added support for gcov-compatible coverage analysis to
> compilation. The remaining missing piece is that we should link against
> libprofile_rt.a when we see the relevant flags in the link step.
> >
> > There's currently code in the Driver which adds "-lgcov" when those flags
> are visible in the link step. Will it break anything for anyone if I remove
> that? Consider the case where someone uses clang to build fortran by running
> gfortran and it emits a calls to libgcov that is then linked by clang?
> >
> > Then I'd like to add in "-l:libprofile_rt.a". I know how gcc puts
> libgcov, but how do we ship libraries alongside clang? Does clang pass
> library search path flags to the linker?
> >
> > If we can't remove -lgcov because of some reason, can we pass both -lgcov
> and "-l:profile_rt.a"? What about people without gcc installed?
>
> I can't see why we can't remove the gcov one. At any rate the symbols
> generated, afaict, are going to have llvm_ prefixed on them and so we'd need
> the libprofile_rt ones anyhow.
>
Sounds good. I've gone ahead and implemented this in the attached patch.
Good to commit?
Nick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20110523/4cc7754f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: clang-libprofile_rt.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4004 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20110523/4cc7754f/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list