[cfe-dev] Clang Analysis of glibc 2.13

[John Smith]

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Jonathan Sauer <jonathan.sauer at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Some of the reports seem to be false positives, though
>
I was on the irc channel #llvm earlier, and some of the friendly folks
over there were kind enough to take a look the reports as well. They
too, concluded that there were quite a lot of false positives. Which
still sounds like 'good' results to me, as that means that the reports
can be used to improve the analyzer so it will create less false
positives in the future.
:)

Thanks for taking a look,


John Smith.