[cfe-dev] AST transformations

[Olaf Krzikalla]

Am 11.03.2011 11:46, schrieb Sebastian Redl:
> On 11.03.2011 11:02, Olaf Krzikalla wrote:
>> Why should I have to deal with Sema at all? AST transformation and
>> rewriting don't care about Sema.
> In C++, there's very little that doesn't care about Sema. Any rewrite
> could require new implicit conversion sequences to be calculated, and
> unless you want to reimplement that code, you need to go through Sema.
Maybe you already can sense the response: do implicit conversion 
sequences belong to an AST at all? Of course, this doesn't solve the 
particular issue. However thinking about the concepts might point in the 
right direction.

Best Olaf