[cfe-dev] [libc++] Comparing vector<T*>::iterator to vector<T*>::const_iterator&

[Howard Hinnant]

Thanks!  Fix committed revision 135854.

It was a problem with the pointer type of unordered_map::const_iterator.  It was value_type* and should have been const value_type*.

Howard

On Jul 23, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Ryuta Suzuki wrote:

> Hi David,
> 
> Thanks for the info. I filed the bug report.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ryuta
> 
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 3:41 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> > My expectation was that libc++ silently convert iterator to const_iterator
> > if necessary, but I guess I'm wrong.
> > Any comments will be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Looks like you're right to expect that, by my reading: 23.2.1\4, Table
> 96, row 3:
> 
> Expression: X::iterator
> ...
> Assertion/note pre-/post-condition: .... convertible to X::const_iterator.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev