[cfe-dev] clang and Crypto++
Eric Christopher
echristo at apple.com
Wed Jan 5 09:53:34 PST 2011
On Jan 5, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Marshall Clow wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Marshall Clow wrote:
>
>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Marshall Clow wrote:
>>>
>>>> After Doug fixed bug #7851 yesterday (thanks, Doug!), I decided to see if crypto++ <http://www.cryptopp.com/> would build with clang TOT.
>>>>
>>>> Answer: No, it does not.
>>>>
>>>> There are three problems:
>>
>> [ #1 and #2 snipped out ]
>>
>>>
>>>> 3) clang is much, much slower than gcc 4.2.1 when building crypto++.
>>>> On my 2007 MacPro:
>>>> gcc takes 8m40s to build.
>>>> clang (TOT this morning) takes much longer; there is one file - sha.cpp which takes over 30 minutes, if it ever does finish, but all the other files combined take more than 45 minutes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Naturally, we'd like to know where in clang this time is going. Is it the front end (-fsyntax-only)? The optimizer (> -O0), and if so, which one(s)?
>>
>> Looks like the optimizer.
>>
>> $ time clang++ -Wno-tautological-compare -DNDEBUG -g -arch x86_64 -arch i386 -DCRYPTOPP_DISABLE_ASM -pipe -fsyntax-only sha.cpp
>> real 6.234s
>> $ time clang++ -Wno-tautological-compare -DNDEBUG -g -arch x86_64 -arch i386 -DCRYPTOPP_DISABLE_ASM -pipe -c sha.cpp
>> real 7.863s
>> $ time clang++ -Wno-tautological-compare -DNDEBUG -g -O1 -arch x86_64 -arch i386 -DCRYPTOPP_DISABLE_ASM -pipe -c sha.cpp
>> real 17.882s
>> $ time clang++ -Wno-tautological-compare -DNDEBUG -g -O2 -arch x86_64 -arch i386 -DCRYPTOPP_DISABLE_ASM -pipe -c sha.cpp
>> .... long, long time; I killed it after 30 minutes.
>>
>> How do I tell which one?
>
> FWIW, it's not all about the optimizer:
> $ time g++ -DNDEBUG -g -O2 -arch x86_64 -arch i386 -DCRYPTOPP_DISABLE_ASM -pipe -c sha.cpp
> real 1.662s
Probably 2 bugs then :)
-eric
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list