[cfe-dev] clang and gcc implement __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ differently

[Joerg Sonnenberger]

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:41:43PM +0100, Nikola Smiljanic wrote:
> You're right, the example was stupid. I'm just trying to understand what
> unused template actually means and more importantly how to check if it's
> used or not?

Unused in the sense that no parameter (and the return type) are derived
from the template parameter.

Joerg