[cfe-dev] please check out compiler-rt

[İsmail Dönmez]

Hi;

2011/12/8 Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>

> Op 8 dec. 2011 21:37 schreef "Eli Friedman" <eli.friedman at gmail.com> het
> volgende:
>
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:26 PM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at namtrac.org>
> wrote:
> > > Hi;
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Executive Summary:
> > >> --
> > >> Please check out compiler-rt into llvm/projects, and keep it up to
> > >> date. For example:
> > >>  (cd ~/llvm/projects && svn co
> > >> http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk compiler-rt)
> > >> or:
> > >>  (cd ~/llvm/projects && git clone http://llvm.org/git/compiler-rt.git
> )
> > >
> > >
> > > cmake build system has no idea about compiler-rt and hence it doesn't
> build
> > > it. Given other problems with cmake buildsystem itself, are cmake files
> > > maintained at all?
> >
> > They're maintained to the point that it is possible to build clang
> > with CMake on Windows in some configurations.  Beyond that, there are
> > rough edges.
>
> Which works quite well, I'm sure there's a simple fix for this
> indeficiency, for those that know where compiler-rt fits in. No need to
> bash something you don't know.
>

No bashing intended, if cmake is supposed to be win32 only its fine, but
people complain when I switch rpm spec to use autotools saying cmake is
much better. At least now I can quote this email to say why.

Thanks,
ismail
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20111208/0214de3b/attachment.html>