[cfe-dev] -ferror-limit omits part of last error message

[Nikola Smiljanic]

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:

> IMO, no. We should get it right. One way to do so would be to emit the
> fatal error rather than the first error that would exceed the threshold,
> rather than following the last error that is permitted within the threshold.
> That's probably easier in general.
>
>
So lets say our limit is 1 and there is only one error in our translation
unit. In this case we wouldn't get the fatal error?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20110816/f5774dd1/attachment.html>