[cfe-dev] Status of various C++0x features in Clang

[Toralf Niebuhr]

Bjarne Stroustrup has a nice List of C++0x Features. He proposes an order of implementation determined by dependency and stability.
http://www2.research.att.com/~bs/C++0xFAQ.html#order

Toralf Niebuhr

Am 14.04.2011 um 12:45 schrieb Carter Cheng:

> Thanks for the replies. I do have one followup question. Since the
> C++0x standard is still in draft form (and this might be a stupid
> question), I am curious how stable various features are. I am
> particularly interested in lambda expressions, uniform initializers
> and the memory model(I think there was a recent CACM article that went
> into some of the issues by Adve and Boehm) and perhaps template
> aliases.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Carter.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Jonathan Sauer <jonathan.sauer at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> I have been looking over the various features on the C++0x page and I
>>>> was wondering if the list was of unimplemented items was up to date.
>>>> There are several items I might be able to do since I have a bit of
>>>> "downtime" at the moment.
>>> 
>>> On the current page (http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html) you can read :
>>> 
>>> Last updated: $Date: 2011-04-03 09:12:46 -0500 (Sun, 03 Apr 2011) $
>>> 
>>> Last-week up-to-date.
>> 
>> Well yes, but in the past C++0x features have been implemented in clang
>> without updating the status page. And there's no guarantee that the page
>> is accurately reflecting clang's C++0x status now (even though it's closer
>> than a few weeks back). Incidentally, "local classes as template parameters"
>> seems to have been at least partially implemented, going from the fact that
>> it is possible in some cases (and not possible in others, i.e. clang crash[*]).
>> 
>> So Carter: I think the best would be to discuss the features you want to
>> implement here; others might point out which parts (or even all) have
>> already been done.
>> 
>> In any case, it is great to see further improvements on the C++0x front :-)
>> 
>> 
>> Jonathan
>> 
>> [*] I'm still working on a test case
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev