[cfe-dev] clang++: '-Wswitch-enum' turned on by default
Chris Lattner
clattner at apple.com
Thu Sep 16 09:12:09 PDT 2010
On Sep 16, 2010, at 6:42 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2010, at 3:30 AM, Alexandre Colucci wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I noticed that clang++ seems to always use the option '-Wswitch-enum'. Shouldn't it be turned off by default?
>
> No, it's an excellent warning to have on by default.
>
>> Or is there a way to turn it off?
>
> -Wno-switch-enum
I think that a more serious issue with the warning is that it can produce a *ton* of noise. In a simple example:
enum x { a, b, c, d, e, f, g };
void foo(enum x a) {
switch (a) {
case b:
case c: break;
}
}
we produce:
t.c:4:11: warning: enumeration value 'a' not handled in switch [-Wswitch-enum]
switch (a) {
^
t.c:4:11: warning: enumeration value 'd' not handled in switch [-Wswitch-enum]
t.c:4:11: warning: enumeration value 'e' not handled in switch [-Wswitch-enum]
t.c:4:11: warning: enumeration value 'f' not handled in switch [-Wswitch-enum]
t.c:4:11: warning: enumeration value 'g' not handled in switch [-Wswitch-enum]
5 warnings generated.
In this case, I think it would be better to emit one warning say:
t.c:4:11: warning: 5 enumeration values not handled in switch: 'a', 'd', 'e' ... [-Wswitch-enum]
or something like that. What do you think?
-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20100916/4f493c5f/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list