[cfe-dev] CFG initializers and destructors patch
Marcin Świderski
marcin.sfider at gmail.com
Mon Sep 6 11:33:03 PDT 2010
W dniu 6 września 2010 07:49 użytkownik Zhongxing Xu
<xuzhongxing at gmail.com>napisał:
>
>
> 2010/9/6 Marcin Świderski <marcin.sfider at gmail.com>
>
> W dniu 6 września 2010 05:37 użytkownik Zhongxing Xu <
>> xuzhongxing at gmail.com> napisał:
>>
>> Hi Marcin,
>>>
>>> Thank you for working on this. This patch is really big. I suggest we
>>> focus on the 'CFGElement' aspect in the first patch, and put the
>>> 'LocalScope' things in later patches.
>>>
>>> About CFGElement, I think we an avoid using two pointers in it. Currently
>>> the second pointer data is used for 'the statement that triggers the dtor. I
>>> think we don't need a pointer for it. The position where the CFGElement
>>> resides is the place where it is triggered. It is not triggered by a
>>> statement.
>>>
>>> Then for the rest one pointer, we let it point to the VarDecl for
>>> AutomaticObjectDtor, to the initializer for Base and Member dtors, to
>>> CXXBindTemporaryExpr for temporary dtor.
>>>
>>> 2010/9/3 Marcin Świderski <marcin.sfider at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I'm sending a patch with implementation of C++
>>>> - initializers from constructor initialization list,
>>>> - implicit destructors for objects with automatic storage duration.
>>>>
>>>> For destructors I've taken care of:
>>>> - block local scopes,
>>>> - if/switch/for/while/do local scopes (in case there's no block),
>>>> - if/switch/for/while condition variables,
>>>> - catch exception variable,
>>>> - temporaries bound to const reference.
>>>>
>>>> Is there something that I've missed?
>>>>
>>>> As it have been suggested I've created hierarchy of CFGElements.
>>>> Currently there're two unused types for implicit destructor calls in
>>>> destructor. I've did not revert ability of CFGElement to cast/dyn_cast to
>>>> Stmt, because it would lead to situation when cast<Stmt>(SomeCFGElement)
>>>> would return null. I did however add method for downcasting CFGElement
>>>> object to object of its implemntation class (returned by value, not pointer)
>>>> with returning invalid object on invalid cast.
>>>>
>>>> I did not add CFGElement for destructors of temporary objects. After
>>>> giving it some thought I came to a conclusion that it shouldn't be covered
>>>> by CFG, because it clearly needs path-sensitiveness.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Marcin
>>>>
>>>
>>> Should I split it and send it cfe-commits with some comments?
>
>
> Yes, I would like we settle down the CFGElement part first, then the CFG
> construction part.
>
I won't be able to prepare patches before the weekend. I hope it won't be
much of a problem to anyone.
As I understand each patch should introduce chunk of code that would not
break the compilation?
Cheers
Marcin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20100906/43aca676/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list