[cfe-dev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables

Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) wan at google.com
Mon Nov 22 20:59:19 PST 2010


On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com> wrote:
> Looks great to me.  One place I'd be happy to experiment with widespread name changes is the static analyzer.  It might be a good isolated "experiment" of showing how these coding conventions could improve readability of the code.

Great to hear about your plan for static analyzer, Ted!  I'll be happy
to contribute refactoring patches to  make it conform to the rule.

>
> On Nov 22, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Based on our discussion last week, I put together a new coding style
>> rule regarding the naming of types/functions/variables.  I've uploaded
>> the patch to
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/3264041
>>
>> Please let me know what you think.  My idea is to start with something
>> non-controversial such that we can get the baseline committed soon.
>> We can then tweak the rule as needed later to cover more specific
>> scenarios.  Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Zhanyong
>
>



-- 
Zhanyong




More information about the cfe-dev mailing list