[cfe-dev] questions on the LLVM coding standards

[Chris Lattner]

On Nov 16, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) wrote:
>> 
>> It is not "necessary", in that it doesn't affect the semantics of the program.  It is better that putting the entire body of the .cpp file in "namespace llvm {" because it reduces nesting and interoperates better with IDEs that like to indent according to braces.
> 
> I see.  It would be nice to add this rationale to the page.  Although
> I can also understand it if you don't want to bloat it...

Sure, done in r119544.  I don't know if it is more or less confusing, but there ya go :)

> Have you seen my patch that fixes some typos and formatting nits in
> the coding standards?  It should be in your inbox waiting for your
> review.  Thanks,

Yep, applied, thanks!

-Chris