[cfe-dev] Apparently valid C++ code rejected as ambiguous

[Csaba Raduly]

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>
> On Nov 12, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Csaba Raduly wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> clang 2.8 fails to compile the following code:
>>
(snip)
>
> This *might* be related to
>
>        http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8130

Looks similar indeed. But the bug is marked fixed; my example code is
still not accepted by: clang version 2.9 (trunk 119002)

> I'm fairly certain that it is not a regression.

You are right, I got confused between LLVM 2.7 and clang 2.7

-- 
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
"Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds
"People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds