[cfe-dev] Syntactic order of CXXBaseOrMemberInitializers

[Anders Carlsson]

On May 20, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:

> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On May 19, 2010, at 4:40 AM, Abramo Bagnara <abramo.bagnara at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> As currently the initializers are reordered to match member order in
>> record declaration there is no easy way for an AST consumer to know in
>> which order the initializers were written in the source file.
> 
> Originally, I had imagined that we would compare based on source locations, and perhaps add an "implicit" bit for implicitly-generated initializers. Does that not work?
> 

If comparing based on source locations works then we don't need an implicit bit - the source location for implicit initializers is always invalid.

- Anders