[cfe-dev] Trouble building libc++

[David Chisnall]

On 12 May 2010, at 22:52, Chris Lattner wrote:

> On May 11, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> 
>> On 05/11/2010 08:59 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>> Internally, we have factored that code out of libstdc++ (this is
>>> largely code that lives in "libsup++") into a library currently
>>> called libc++abi.dylib.
>> 
>> What's the harm in putting that source in llvm svn also?
> 
> I'm not opposed to doing this.  We'd probably want to keep it in a separate svn module just to keep the licenses clear and obvious.

On a related note - is it documented anywhere exactly what is required from the ABI module?  Presumably this includes things like the unwinding library, or is that a separate module again?

David

-- Sent from my Difference Engine