[cfe-dev] QualifiedTemplateName as inner type of an ElaboratedType ?

[John McCall]

On Jun 5, 2010, at 3:36 AM, Enea Zaffanella wrote:
> Should clang get rid of the redundant qualification in the 
> ElaboratedType (and DependentNameType) whenever the inner type already 
> has name qualification info (i.e., a QualifiedTemplateName or a 
> DependentTemplateName and maybe others)?
> 
> Or should clang rather insist on a stronger (and simpler?) design where 
> a TemplateName is *never* qualified, i.e., any qualifier should be 
> encoded as an external ElaboratedType (or DependentNameType) wrapper?

This would be better;  I don't think we really get anything out of the current
redundancy in TemplateName.  We might need a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType first, though.

John.