[cfe-dev] clang vs boost - take 3

[Douglas Gregor]

On Jan 29, 2010, at 1:04 AM, Maurice Gittens wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> today, llvm and clang actually links again on my Linux box so I decided to
> see how well clang currently does at compiling the boost headers.
> 
> It turns out that there remain only 7 top-level boost header files
> that do not compile for me with the current version of clang.

That's progress!

> More specifically the toplevel header files:
> 
> #include <boost/regex.hpp>       
> #include <boost/unordered_set.hpp> 
> #include <boost/unordered_map.hpp> 
> #include <boost/dynamic_bitset.hpp> 
> #include <boost/asio.hpp> 
> 
> do not yet compile with clang++ for me.
> 
> Compilation of the above header files all crash as a result of the following assertion failure.
> // clang: SemaExpr.cpp:1521: clang::ASTOwningResult<&clang::ActionBase::DeleteExpr> clang::Sema::BuildDeclarationNameExpr(const clang::CXXScopeSpec&, clang::SourceLocation, clang::NamedDecl*): Assertion `!isa<FunctionTemplateDecl>(D) && "Cannot refer unambiguously to a function template"' failed.

I've now fixed this one.

> Should I close the bug reports that now appear to have been currently fixed?

I think I've already done this. However, there's one remaining Boost-related issue that we know about:

	http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6089

	- Doug