[cfe-dev] Missing method in TypeVisitor ?
Enea Zaffanella
zaffanella at cs.unipr.it
Tue Feb 9 23:39:58 PST 2010
Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Enea Zaffanella wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I just noticed that, in file TypeNodes.def, there is no entry for
>>
>> DependentTypeOfExprType
>>
>> As a consequence, there is no corresponding visiting method in
>> TypeVisitor: I guess these nodes get visited by
>> VisitTypeOfExprType() due to public inheritance.
>>
>> Is this what was really meant?
>
> Yes, that is intended. DependentTypeOfExprType is meant only as a
> storage type, which retains a reference to the ASTContext so that it
> can be profiled. AST clients should just use it as a TypeOfExprType.
>
> - Doug
>
Now I see ... and I suppose it is the same for DependentDecltypeType.
Are there other cases?
It would be nice to improve the documentation of these classes,
e.g., by adding a sentence such as:
"AST clients should exploit inheritance and just use base class XXX."
Cheers,
Enea Zaffanella.
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list