[cfe-dev] clang and code coverage?
Sean McBride
sean at rogue-research.com
Mon Aug 30 12:27:25 PDT 2010
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:19:04 -0700, Douglas Gregor said:
>> Is there any way to measure code coverage when using clang?
>>
>> The gcov docs say: "gcov works only on code compiled with GCC." Is this
>> true of code built by clang? Or does clang's "GCC compatibility" design
>> goal extend to this situation? If not, does/will the llvm project
>> include a replacement for gcov?
>
>Neither Clang nor LLVM have the ability to generate coverage code for
>gcov. I do not know of any replacements in the works.
Thanks Doug for your reply.
Is there a bug for this? I searched but could not find one. I filed
<rdar://problem/8107317> after WWDC10 but I'd like to have a bug in the
public llvm.org database too.
As more and more Objective-C features _require_ clang[1], Mac developers
will be forced to choose between these nice new features and being able
to measure code coverage. I'm not looking forward to that choice. :(
[1] <http://www.mcubedsw.com/blog/index.php/site/comments/new_objective-
c_features/>
Cheers,
--
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng sean at rogue-research.com
Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list