[cfe-dev] Storage class as written in the source.

[Enea Zaffanella]

Enea Zaffanella wrote:
[...]
> Hence, will it be OK if we leave the extra argument in the constructors 
> of the AST nodes above?

If the answer to the above question is positive, then here is revised patch.

Cheers,
Enea Zaffanella.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: StorageClassAsWritten-2.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 60602 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20100417/ad8aa065/attachment.bin>