[cfe-dev] Fwd: RFC: c++ diagnostics

[Douglas Gregor]

On Apr 5, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:

> FYI, a very useful resource.

This one, in particular, could use some help:

	http://people.redhat.com/bkoz/diagnostics/diagnostics.html#9335

Anyone want to contribute a patch to suppress some template instantiation contexts when there are too many?

	- Doug

> -Chris
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat.com>
>> Date: April 5, 2010 8:20:33 AM PDT
>> To: libstdc++ at gcc.gnu.org, gcc at gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: RFC: c++ diagnostics
>> 
>> 
>> Hello all! 
>> 
>> I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
>> clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
>> compilers. 
>> 
>> Included are most of the outstanding bugzilla requests with the
>> "diagnostic" keyword. However, I am looking for help! Please send me
>> code samples that frustrate, obfuscate, and annoy. 
>> 
>> In particular, I am looking for template instantiation issues such as
>> c++/41884, but hopefully something in a deliciously small snippet. No
>> doubt other C++ hackers have particular annoyances.
>> 
>> I'm also looking for guidance on how to rank the priority of these
>> issues. Is there some way to tell what the biggest annoyance is?
>> 
>> http://people.redhat.com/bkoz/diagnostics/diagnostics.html
>> 
>> best,
>> benjamin
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20100405/812d95b6/attachment.html>