[cfe-dev] A proposed path for PPC registers was Re: PPC asm register definitions
clattner at apple.com
Tue Sep 15 22:05:56 PDT 2009
On Sep 15, 2009, at 4:06 AM, Richard Pennington wrote:
> Chris Lattner wrote:
>> "3" is probably valid on ppc targets that don't use "r" prefixes on
>> their registers. Is that the case? clang can convert asm
>> constraints as needed to make the llvm backend happy.
> I've attached a proposed patch for clang's Targets.cpp. I don't have
> commit permission for clang so could someone take a look and apply
> it if it is appropriate?
I don't know if it's good or not, but I applied it in r82009. People
who care about ppc in clang should speak up if they don't like it :)
More information about the cfe-dev