[cfe-dev] Which revision of clang for LLVM2.5?

[Daniel Dunbar]

Well, it looks like 2.5 was tagged at r65926, try grabbing that version of
clang?

http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=65926

 - Daniel

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Graham Wakefield <
lists at grahamwakefield.net> wrote:

> That's what I've been doing so far, however it's caught me out on several
> occasions. I'm maintaining a project that uses LLVM quite extensively, with
> other developers, across two platforms. Every time I move to a new
> development machine and check out & rebuild the latest LLVM/clang svn, I
> have to make minor updates to my own code to match the changes in the
> LLVM/clang C++ API. Naturally, that means that every other development
> machine also has to check out & rebuild the latest svn at the same time...
>
> I guess I could embed the LLVM/Clang source tree into my own project, but
> I'd rather not if possible. So I was hoping to find a 'reference version'
> that I could work my own code against, until clang gets folded into a stable
> LLVM release. I figured there might be an earlier revision in the svn
> history that would conform to LLVM release 2.4/2.5.
>
> On Mar 13, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>
> Do you have a particular reason for using LLVM 2.5? Since you are already
> checking out the source, why not just use LLVM top of tree with clang top of
> tree. This should always work, and if not its a bug and we are generally
> quite quick to fix it.
>
> If you really want to do this all someone needs to do is find the revision
> where we tagged LLVM 2.5, checking out that clang revision should work fine
> with that LLVM.
>
>  - Daniel
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Graham Wakefield <
> lists at grahamwakefield.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Which revision of clang is safe to build against LLVM 2.5?  Just tried
>> on the current svn and got a whole range of build errors for clang.
>>
>> If there is none, then which is safe against 2.4?
>>
>> Thanks
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20090313/24b5c67f/attachment.html>