[cfe-dev] UCNs/extended characters revisitted

[Ned Holbrook]

On Jul 12, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:

> Adding a 2.5M database to clang sounds like a non-starter.  When we
> actually care enough about this, hopefully there will be a better way
> to go.  Neil, do you know of a good way to do this sort of check?

I'm working on this now. Worst (simplest) case would be two 32K  
tables, one for each of the tables in Annex A of TR 10176. Best case  
will be less, TBD by how much.

Speaking of which, does anyone have a copy of  
ISOIEC_TR_10176_2003_Table.txt as referenced by the aforementioned  
public specification? The table is not easily extracted from the PDF  
due to it being rotated.

Ned