[cfe-dev] Fixing selector types on the GNU runtime

[David Chisnall]

On 21 Jan 2009, at 19:04, Mike Stump wrote:

> On Jan 21, 2009, at 4:18 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
>> my diff will avoid real issues on platforms like Win64, where 0 and  
>> 0L, the two suggested definitions of NULL from the standard, are  
>> both smaller than pointers.
>
> What _is_ NULL defined to on Win64?

I presume that depends on the compiler you use and the headers you  
include...

David