[cfe-dev] Fixing selector types on the GNU runtime

[Roman Divacky]

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:29:38PM -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
> 
> On Jan 19, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> 
> > On Jan 18, 2009, at 3:01 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
> >> NULL is #defined as 0 for C++ on FreeBSD.
> >
> > This is wrong.  If you're using a recent g++ based compiler, NULL
> > should be __null in g++.  :-)
> >
> >> I get missing sentinels in a huge numbers of missing sentinel errors
> >> when
> >> building LLVM.
> >
> > And do they go away if you have NULL defined correctly?
> 
> I agree with Mike here.  FreeBSD should be using __null or 0L.  I  
> don't think we should switch CGObjCGNU to using a different idiom than  
> the rest of the code base, and I don't want to change the entire LLVM  
> world to avoid NULL in varargs.
> 
> If FreeBSD headers are broken and they are unwilling to fix it, we can  
> probably do a hack for FreeBSD in the makefiles.

I'll try to do something to fix it... thnx for noticing the bug