[cfe-dev] Ideas for member access

[Sebastian Redl]

Douglas Gregor wrote:
>
> On Feb 8, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Sebastian Redl wrote:
>
>> Douglas Gregor wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Sebastian Redl wrote:
>>>> It seems that, after templates, the only big C++ feature that's far
>>>> from
>>>> complete is member access checking. So I'd like to know if anyone has
>>>> already thought about this and has some design ideas.
>>>
>>>
>>> My only thought about member access checking is that we can safely
>>> ignore it for a quite a while longer, if we want to, since a
>>> well-formed C++03 program can still compile even if we don't do any
>>> access checking.
>> True, but I need something to do.
>
> Oh, well, in *that* case... :)
>
> I have a mental checklist of easily-separable features and semantics
> that need to be implemented. If it would be helpful, I could augment
> the C++ status page with a "C++ suggested TODO list" of such tasks.
That would be nice indeed.

Sebastian