[cfe-dev] My first patch to clang

Chris Lattner clattner at apple.com
Sat Dec 5 10:33:43 PST 2009

On Dec 5, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Charles Davis wrote:

> Ivan Sorokin wrote:
>> Chris Lattner wrote:
>>> "pointer to a record type for which the field would be valid".  We  
>>> might as well test that the field makes sense as well.
>>> Thanks again for working on this, it's great to get this enhancement,
>> You need also to check if class has overloaded operator->.
> No he doesn't.

Even if he does, his patch is still a very nice improvement over what we have.  Handling operator-> can be a follow-on :)


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list