[cfe-dev] Better type-specifier representation
kremenek at apple.com
Fri Sep 12 17:12:05 PDT 2008
On Sep 12, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote:
>> Is this restricted to VLAs ?
>> Doesn't this have the same issue ?:
>> const int x=10;
>> int y[x+1]; // type owning expression "x+1"
> Huh. Does gcc treat 'y' and as a VLA or as a constant-sized array? I
> guess gcc's constant folding built into the frontend would make that a
> constant-sized array.
I guess this isn't (strictly-speaking) a VLA since this is example is C
Nevertheless, should we treat these as VLAs in the ASTs?
More information about the cfe-dev