[cfe-dev] Should we build semantically invalid nodes?
Argiris Kirtzidis
akyrtzi at gmail.com
Fri Oct 24 04:29:53 PDT 2008
Argiris Kirtzidis wrote:
> To get more specific about Sebastian's patch, I tried it out and it
> works quite well, Clang is pretty robust:
>
> typedef int fn(int,int);
> int f() {
> int a;
> reinterpret_cast<fn>(a)(1,2,3);
> int (*fx)(int,int) = reinterpret_cast<fn>(a);
> }
I mean, Clang builds a nice AST tree of everything for the above snippet.
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list