[cfe-dev] Implementation of stddef.h

Eli Friedman eli.friedman at gmail.com
Sun May 18 11:04:54 PDT 2008

Should I take the fact that there have been no comments as meaning the
patch is bad, the patch is okay, or just that nobody with the
appropriate expertise had the time to take a look at it?


On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Per subject, implementation of stddef.h.
> This implementation is correct per C99, but glibc does some funny
> stuff including certain headers, so I'm not sure if this is completely
> correct.
> -Eli

More information about the cfe-dev mailing list