[cfe-dev] Weak linkage for inline
clattner at apple.com
Fri Jun 27 11:43:01 PDT 2008
On Jun 27, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Argiris Kirtzidis wrote:
>> The correct comparison is with llvm-gcc -std=c99. clang is in fact
>> wrong here, but it's a bit more complicated.
> Can we change it to 'linkonce' until the correct semantics are in
> place ?
> The issue with 'weak' is that the inliner leaves it untouched and this
> section is produced in the assembly output:
> .section .llvm.linkonce.t._f,"ax", at progbits
> which is ELF specific, is this correct ?
I'm not sure what you mean. Are you not on an ELF system? If not,
the llvm backend for your target has a bug.
More information about the cfe-dev