[cfe-dev] Implementation of stdbool.h

Eli Friedman eli.friedman at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 08:06:02 PST 2008

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Timo Savola <timo.savola at iki.fi> wrote:
> This is a bit irrelevant in more than one way at the moment, but for
>  future G++ compatibility there should be a check for __cplusplus.

Hmm, that's a good point... I hadn't really thought about C++.  I
won't mess with it for now, and we can audit the headers for C++
support once a significant fraction are implemented (the C++ standard
has its own extensive section about standard headers which I haven't
read in detail).

> (Does
>  the GCC compatibility of clang extend beyond the command-line parameters
>  of the ccc wrapper script?)

clang intends to be gcc-compatible as far as is necessary for existing
code to continue working, which means supporting essentially every
interesting gcc extension.  Of course, some stuff still isn't


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list