[PATCH] D56444: [AST] RecursiveASTVisitor visits lambda classes when implicit visitation is on.
Manuel Klimek via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 9 02:59:56 PST 2019
klimek added a comment.
In D56444#1350746 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444#1350746>, @sammccall wrote:
> In D56444#1350252 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444#1350252>, @JonasToth wrote:
>
> > I still see the unit-test crashing for `ExprMutAnalyzer` (just apply the last two tests https://github.com/JonasToth/clang/blob/fix_crash/unittests/Analysis/ExprMutationAnalyzerTest.cpp and run `check-clang-unit`)
>
>
> The `ReproduceFailure11` test passes for me, and the `ReproduceFailureMinimal` fails to compile (`a&&`).
>
> > The clang-tidy check does not crash anymore, but `readability-function-size` regresses. It probably doesn't properly count for lambdas anymore.
>
> Rather, it previously **didn't** count lambda bodies as functions (because `functionDecl()` didn't include them), and now it does :-)
> I think counting them is better behavior, but I've modified the matcher to preserve the behavior for now.
>
> @klimek: would it be better to preserve the odd behavior of the `functionDecl()` matcher, and add a new `functionOrLambdaDecl()`? It seems too surprising to me.
I'm in favor of functionDecl really being a very simple matcher. Every time we tried to be smart in the end it turned out that wasn't the right call.
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list