[PATCH] D55260: [CodeComplete] Fix a crash in access checks of inner classes
Ilya Biryukov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 4 03:33:14 PST 2018
ilya-biryukov updated this revision to Diff 176593.
ilya-biryukov added a comment.
- Actually use the computed NamingClass
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55260/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55260
Files:
lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp
test/CodeCompletion/accessibility.cpp
Index: test/CodeCompletion/accessibility.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/CodeCompletion/accessibility.cpp
+++ test/CodeCompletion/accessibility.cpp
@@ -71,3 +71,27 @@
// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=UNRELATED %s
}
};
+
+class Outer {
+ public:
+ static int pub;
+ protected:
+ static int prot;
+ private:
+ static int priv;
+
+ class Inner {
+ int test() {
+ Outer::pub = 10;
+ // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:85:14 %s -o - \
+ // RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=OUTER %s
+ // OUTER: priv : [#int#]priv
+ // OUTER: prot : [#int#]prot
+ // OUTER: pub : [#int#]pub
+
+ // Also check the unqualified case.
+ // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:85:1 %s -o - \
+ // RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=OUTER %s
+ }
+ };
+};
Index: lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp
+++ lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
+#include "clang/AST/DeclBase.h"
#include "clang/AST/DeclCXX.h"
#include "clang/AST/DeclObjC.h"
#include "clang/AST/ExprCXX.h"
@@ -1313,23 +1314,39 @@
void FoundDecl(NamedDecl *ND, NamedDecl *Hiding, DeclContext *Ctx,
bool InBaseClass) override {
- // Naming class to use for access check. In most cases it was provided
- // explicitly (e.g. member access (lhs.foo) or qualified lookup (X::)), for
- // unqualified lookup we fallback to the \p Ctx in which we found the
- // member.
- auto *NamingClass = this->NamingClass;
- if (!NamingClass)
- NamingClass = llvm::dyn_cast_or_null<CXXRecordDecl>(Ctx);
- bool Accessible =
- Results.getSema().IsSimplyAccessible(ND, NamingClass, BaseType);
ResultBuilder::Result Result(ND, Results.getBasePriority(ND), nullptr,
- false, Accessible, FixIts);
+ false, IsAccessible(ND, Ctx), FixIts);
Results.AddResult(Result, InitialLookupCtx, Hiding, InBaseClass);
}
void EnteredContext(DeclContext *Ctx) override {
Results.addVisitedContext(Ctx);
}
+
+ private:
+ bool IsAccessible(NamedDecl *ND, DeclContext *Ctx) {
+ auto *Cls = llvm::dyn_cast_or_null<CXXRecordDecl>(Ctx);
+ if (!Cls)
+ return true; // Only class members require access checking.
+
+ // Naming class to use for access check. In most cases it was provided
+ // explicitly (e.g. member access (lhs.foo) or qualified lookup (X::)),
+ // for unqualified lookup we fallback to the \p Ctx in which we found the
+ // member.
+ auto *NamingClass = this->NamingClass;
+ QualType BaseType = this->BaseType;
+ if (!NamingClass)
+ NamingClass = Cls;
+ // When we emulate implicit 'this->' in an unqualified lookup, we might end
+ // up with an invalid naming class. In that case, we avoid emulating
+ // 'this->' qualifier to satisfy preconditions of the access checking.
+ if (NamingClass->getCanonicalDecl() != Cls->getCanonicalDecl() &&
+ !NamingClass->isDerivedFrom(Cls)) {
+ NamingClass = Cls;
+ BaseType = QualType();
+ }
+ return Results.getSema().IsSimplyAccessible(ND, NamingClass, BaseType);
+ }
};
} // namespace
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D55260.176593.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3407 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20181204/15a10993/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list