[PATCH] D54560: [analyzer] MoveChecker Pt.3: Improve warning messages a bit.

[Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

NoQ added a comment.

In D54560#1302051 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D54560#1302051>, @MTC wrote:

> > The "moved-from" terminology we adopt here still feels a bit weird to me, but i don't have a better suggestion, so i just removed the single-quotes so that to at least feel proud about what we have.
>
> I am personally fine with this terminology, this checker corresponds to the cert rule **EXP63-CPP. Do not rely on the value of a moved-from object**, and **moved from** is also used in many places in CppCoreGuidelines.


Double-checked - this terminology does indeed come from the Standard:

**15.5.5.15 Moved-from state of library types [lib.types.movedfrom]**
1 Objects of types defined in the C++ standard library may be moved from (10.3.4.2). Move operations may be explicitly specified or implicitly generated. Unless otherwise specified, such moved-from objects shall be placed in a valid but unspecified state.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D54560/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D54560