[PATCH] D54556: [analyzer] MoveChecker Pt.1: Give MisusedMovedObject checker a more consistent name.

[Gábor Horváth via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

xazax.hun accepted this revision.
xazax.hun added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Looks good. Do we plan to detect problems other than use after move? Maybe it would be worth to synchronize with the tidy checker name use-after-move or is it going to cause more confusion?


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D54556