r346696 - [NFC] Fix formatting in inline nested namespace definition.
Erich Keane via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 12 11:29:26 PST 2018
Author: erichkeane
Date: Mon Nov 12 11:29:26 2018
New Revision: 346696
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=346696&view=rev
Log:
[NFC] Fix formatting in inline nested namespace definition.
Apparently my invocation of clang-format in VIM didn't get this right,
but the patch-version DID. This patch just runs CF on this file.
Change-Id: Ied462a2d921cbb813fa427740d3ef6e97959b56d
Modified:
cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx2a-inline-nested-namespace-definition.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx2a-inline-nested-namespace-definition.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx2a-inline-nested-namespace-definition.cpp?rev=346696&r1=346695&r2=346696&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx2a-inline-nested-namespace-definition.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx2a-inline-nested-namespace-definition.cpp Mon Nov 12 11:29:26 2018
@@ -16,14 +16,14 @@ inline namespace foo4::foo5::foo6 { // e
#else
// expected-warning at +2 {{inline nested namespace definition is incompatible with C++ standards before C++2a}}
#endif
-namespace valid1::valid2::inline valid3::inline valid4::valid5{}
+namespace valid1::valid2::inline valid3::inline valid4::valid5 {}
// expected-note at -1 2 {{previous definition is here}}
#if __cplusplus <= 201402L
// expected-warning at +3 {{nested namespace definition is a C++17 extension; define each namespace separately}}
#endif
//expected-warning at +1 2 {{inline namespace reopened as a non-inline namespace}}
-namespace valid1::valid2::valid3::valid4::valid5{}
+namespace valid1::valid2::valid3::valid4::valid5 {}
#if __cplusplus <= 201402L
// expected-warning at +7 {{nested namespace definition is a C++17 extension; define each namespace separately}}
@@ -33,19 +33,19 @@ namespace valid1::valid2::valid3::valid4
#else
// expected-warning at +2 {{inline nested namespace definition is incompatible with C++ standards before C++2a}}
#endif
-namespace valid1::valid2::inline valid3::inline valid4::valid5{}
+namespace valid1::valid2::inline valid3::inline valid4::valid5 {}
// expected-note at -1 2 {{previous definition is here}}
namespace valid1 {
- namespace valid2 {
+namespace valid2 {
//expected-warning at +1 {{inline namespace reopened as a non-inline namespace}}
- namespace valid3 {
+namespace valid3 {
//expected-warning at +1 {{inline namespace reopened as a non-inline namespace}}
- namespace valid4 {
- namespace valid5 {
- }
- }
- }
- }
+namespace valid4 {
+namespace valid5 {
}
+} // namespace valid4
+} // namespace valid3
+} // namespace valid2
+} // namespace valid1
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list