[PATCH] D53417: [Clang][Sema][PowerPC] Choose a better candidate in overload function call if there is a compatible vector conversion instead of ambiguous call error

[Nemanja Ivanovic via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

nemanjai added a comment.

@hubert.reinterpretcast Have your comments been addressed adequately in the latest version of the patch? Do you have an opinion on adding the test case I proposed?



================
Comment at: clang/test/Sema/altivec-generic-overload.c:1
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=powerpc64le-unknown-linux -target-feature +altivec -target-feature +vsx -verify -verify-ignore-unexpected=note -pedantic -fsyntax-only
+
----------------
Do we perhaps want a test case that actually tests which overload was chosen to make sure this doesn't change with any potential future changes to overload resolution?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D53417