r345211 - [SemaCXX] Unconfuse Clang when std::align_val_t is unscoped in C++03
Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Oct 24 15:38:49 PDT 2018
Author: ericwf
Date: Wed Oct 24 15:38:49 2018
New Revision: 345211
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=345211&view=rev
Log:
[SemaCXX] Unconfuse Clang when std::align_val_t is unscoped in C++03
Summary:
When -faligned-allocation is specified in C++03 libc++ defines std::align_val_t as an unscoped enumeration type (because Clang didn't provide scoped enumerations as an extension until 8.0).
Unfortunately Clang confuses the `align_val_t` overloads of delete with the sized deallocation overloads which aren't enabled. This caused Clang to call the aligned deallocation function as if it were the sized deallocation overload.
For example: https://godbolt.org/z/xXJELh
This patch fixes the confusion.
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53508
Added:
cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/cxx03-aligned-allocation-unscoped-enum.cpp
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp?rev=345211&r1=345210&r2=345211&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp Wed Oct 24 15:38:49 2018
@@ -1515,8 +1515,9 @@ namespace {
if (FD->getNumParams() == NumBaseParams + 2)
HasAlignValT = HasSizeT = true;
else if (FD->getNumParams() == NumBaseParams + 1) {
- HasSizeT = FD->getParamDecl(NumBaseParams)->getType()->isIntegerType();
- HasAlignValT = !HasSizeT;
+ QualType ParamTy = FD->getParamDecl(NumBaseParams)->getType();
+ HasAlignValT = ParamTy->isAlignValT();
+ HasSizeT = !HasAlignValT && ParamTy->isIntegerType();
}
// In CUDA, determine how much we'd like / dislike to call this.
Added: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/cxx03-aligned-allocation-unscoped-enum.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/cxx03-aligned-allocation-unscoped-enum.cpp?rev=345211&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/cxx03-aligned-allocation-unscoped-enum.cpp (added)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/cxx03-aligned-allocation-unscoped-enum.cpp Wed Oct 24 15:38:49 2018
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 %s -faligned-allocation \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+// Ensure Clang doesn't confuse std::align_val_t with the sized deallocation
+// parameter when the enum type is unscoped. Libc++ does this in C++03 in order
+// to support aligned allocation in that dialect.
+
+using size_t = __decltype(sizeof(0));
+
+namespace std {
+enum align_val_t { zero = size_t(0),
+ max = size_t(-1) };
+}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: define void @_Z1fPi(
+void f(int *p) {
+ // CHECK-NOT: call void @_ZdlPvSt11align_val_t(
+ // CHECK: call void @_ZdlPv(
+ // CHECK: ret void
+ delete p;
+}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list